Maine
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
45
#38
Residents per Square Mile
The relationship between population density and both social and economic outcomes is a complex interplay of numerous factors. Population density, defined as the number of people per square mile, varies tremendously across the United States. High population densities, such as those seen in the cities and suburbs of the eastern seaboard, spur bustling economic and social environments and foster the sort of environments synonymous with words like 'cosmopolitan' and 'urban.' However, these come with their own challenges like inflated housing costs, heightened pollution, and pressure on existing resources. On the opposite end, lower densities can offer serene landscapes and close-knit communities, but can also present challenges related to economic development and risk isolation on multiple fronts. Key findings from the data include:
The states lining the Atlantic coast dominate in terms of population density, with five northeastern states claiming the top spots. Interestingly, these states are relatively small in terms of total land area but packed with people, hence their high population densities. At the apex of the list is New Jersey, with the highest density of 1,259 residents per square mile. Known for its strong economy, diverse population, and proximity to major cities like New York City and Philadelphia, it's not surprising it holds the number one spot. Not far behind is Rhode Island, embodying the phrase "small but mighty." Despite its limited size, Rhode Island has a density of 1,055 residents per square mile, consolidating its position as the second most densely populated state. Next in line is Massachusetts, with a population density of 894. Rooted in its rich history and bolstered by the economic and social powerhouses of Boston and Cambridge, Massachusetts continues to draw in residents, increasing its sizable population density. Following closely is Connecticut, with a density of 749 residents per square mile. As one of the original 13 colonies, Connecticut has long been a favored destination for those seeking a mix of urban life, picturesque landscapes, and maritime charm. Rounding out the top five, Maryland packs 634 people into each square mile, highlighting the popularity and economic draw of this mid-east coast state. Beyond the northeast, Delaware, positioned at sixth with a 529 population density, and Florida, standing at seventh with 423 residents per square mile, are notable for their density amidst their more sparsely populated regional counterparts. The list is concluded by New York with 414 residents per square mile, Pennsylvania with 289, and Ohio with 288 residents per square mile. Most Dense States:
At the very bottom of the density scale is Alaska. Despite its massive geographical area, its population is notably sparse, with a density of just a single resident per square mile. Alaska's unique environment and remote location lead to it having the lowest population density in the United States. Following Alaska is Wyoming, with six residents per square mile. Known for its wide-open plains and stunning mountain views, Wyoming provides a stark contrast in density compared to states like New Jersey. Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, with densities of 8, 11, and 12 residents per square mile respectively, primarily comprise rural residences and farmland. These states, in the heart of America's agricultural regions, are characterized by small towns interspersed within vast tracts of land. Continuing in this trend, we see New Mexico, Idaho, Nebraska, Nevada, and Kansas with densities ranging from 17 to 36 residents per square mile. Be it New Mexico's desert expanses, Idaho's forested mountain ranges, Nebraska's open prairies, Nevada's remote desert cities, or Kansas's rolling plains, each of these states stands testament to America's vast rural landscape. Least Dense States:
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
101
#27
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
1
#50
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
66
#32
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
59
#35
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
250
#11
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
57
#37
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
749
#4
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
529
#6
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
423
#7
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
192
#16
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
223
#13
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
24
#44
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
225
#12
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
191
#17
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
57
#36
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
36
#41
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
114
#24
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
105
#26
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
45
#38
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
634
#5
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
894
#3
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
177
#19
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
72
#30
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
62
#33
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
90
#28
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
8
#48
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
26
#43
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
29
#42
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
157
#21
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
1,259
#1
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
17
#45
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
414
#8
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
223
#14
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
11
#47
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
288
#10
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
59
#34
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
44
#39
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
289
#9
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
1,055
#2
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
179
#18
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
12
#46
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
173
#20
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
117
#23
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
42
#40
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
70
#31
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
221
#15
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
118
#22
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
73
#29
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
109
#25
Metric
Value
Rank
Residents per Square Mile
6
#49